Stars: Renee Zellweger, Colin Firth, Patrick Dempsey
Writers: Helen Fielding and Dan Mazer and Emma Thompson, based on the novels and characters created by Helen Fielding
Director: Sharon Maguire
Release Date: September 16, 2016
In 2001, we had BRIDGET JONES’S DIARY, based on the best-selling novel by Helen Fielding about a London “singleton” who worried incessantly about her weight and getting a boyfriend, not always in that order. In 2004, the main characters from DIARY returned in BRIDGET JONES: THE EDGE OF REASON. That film saw the title heroine, played by Renee Zellweger, apparently happily paired off with the exceptionally straight-laced barrister Mark Darcy (Colin Firth) at its end.
Now, twelve years later, we’ve got BRIDGET JONES’S BABY. Both Zellweger and Firth are back, and in screen time, it’s been over ten years since the end of the last film. Alas, Bridget and Mark are no longer together – except they keep getting thrown together again, and at last give in to one night of passion.
This would be fine, except that Bridget a week earlier has already had a night of passion with charming American Jack (Patrick Dempsey). This would also be fine, except that Bridget ends up pregnant and can’t be sure who the father is.
The good here: for fans of the earlier films, BRIDGET JONES’S BABY, retains their tone and most of their characters. There is some inspired laugh-out-loud slapstick. There are very welcome turns from supporting actor Jim Broadbent, returning as Bridget’s loving father, and from Emma Thompson, who is also credited as one of the screenwriters, as Bridget’s wise obstetrician. The ending is well- reasoned and shows rather than tells. There’s a gorgeous and inviting music festival that looks like and plays as a lot of fun.
The bad: while Dempsey is charming, Jack is set up as such a paragon that it’s hard to accept his existence, even in these relatively fairytale surroundings. For someone who is as successful as Jack is supposed to be, he’s remarkably available to Bridget at all times, with no assistants or emergency work interruptions. Then there’s Bridget herself, who remains more charming to her fellow characters than she is to most of the audience. Bridget doesn’t much help her friends out and she is perpetually upset that Mark is such a workaholic. If we’re meant to take this as a serious obstacle to the relationship, perhaps the writers could have given Bridget a career less demanding than TV news producer. Not incidentally, Bridget abuses her job in ways that are meant to be comedic but are actually kind of disturbing. Bridget’s new boss is meant to be a tyrant, but she in fact puts up with a number of incidents that would get somebody else fired.
The ugly: A character pretending to be someone he or she isn’t has been the basis for comedy since the form was invented. However, in 2016, when a heterosexual male character who’s meant to be likable pretends to be gay and overdoes it, even in a movie that has positive (albeit minor) gay characters elsewhere, that’s icky. So is Bridget (and several others) mistaking one Asian man for another.
Still, BRIDGET JONES’S BABY is pretty much in keeping with the content and tone of its predecessors. Those who liked the first two films should like this BABY; those who didn’t like the first two films probably won’t be inclined to take a look, no matter what the reviews say.
Related: Movie Review: MORGAN
Related: Movie Review: IMPERIUM
Related: Movie Review: JASON BOURNE
Related: Movie Review: LIGHTS OUT
Related: Movie Review: STAR TREK BEYOND
Related: Movie Review: EQUALS
Related: Movie Review: THE LEGEND OF TARZAN
Related: Movie Review: FREE STATE OF JONES
Related: Movie Review: THE SHALLOWS
Related: Movie Review: WARCRAFT
Related: Movie Review: THE CONJURING 2
Follow us on Twitter at ASSIGNMENT X
Like us on Facebook at ASSIGNMENT X
Article Source: Assignment X
Article: Movie Review: BRIDGET JONES’S BABY